0.0 z 5 hvězdiček
kniha
The Moral Conflict of Law and Neuroscience
Kniha ( měkká vazba )
- Produkt je nedostupný.
Law relies on a conception of human agency, the idea that humans are capable of making their own choices and are morally responsible for the consequences. But what if that is not the case? Over the past half century, the story of the law has been one of increased acuity concerning the human condition, especially the workings of the brain.… Přejít na celý popis
Děkujeme za čtivý rok 2024! Vážíme si vaší věrnosti a jako poděkování vám nabízíme možnost stáhnout si šest e-knih zdarma.
Více informací
K tomuto produktu zákazníci kupují
-
The Frontiers of Knowledge
-
The Secret Body: How the New Science of the Human Body Is Changing the Way We Live
-
Weird Maths: At the Edge of Infinity and Beyond
-
Mindwandering
-
Global Catastrophes and Trends : The Next Fifty Years
-
The Future of Geography
-
Firmament: The Hidden Science of Weather, Climate Change and the Air That Surrounds Us
-
How AI Thinks
-
This Mortal Coil
-
Stephen Hawking : Friendship and Physics
-
Memorix Histology
-
Pathogenesis: How germs made history
-
Four Ways of Thinking
-
A New Science of Heaven
-
You're Not 'Fat', You're On Fire
-
If Nietzsche Were a Narwhal: What Animal Intelligence Reveals About Human Stupidity
-
The Diet Myth
-
On the Origin of Time
-
Oxford Handbook of Clinical Medicine
-
Sapiens A Graphic History, Volume 2
-
Magic Pill
-
Bird: The Definitive Visual Guide
-
How the World Really Works
-
Trees: From Root to Leaf
Law relies on a conception of human agency, the idea that humans are capable of making their own choices and are morally responsible for the consequences. But what if that is not the case? Over the past half century, the story of the law has been one of increased acuity concerning the human condition, especially the workings of the brain. The law already considers select cognitive realities in evaluating questions of agency and responsibility, such as age, sanity, and emotional distress. As new neuroscientific research comprehensively calls into question the very idea of free will, how should the law respond to this revised understanding? Peter A. Alces considers where and how the law currently fails to appreciate the neuroscientific revelation that humans may in key ways lack normative free will and therefore moral responsibility. The most accessible setting in which to consider the potential impact of neuroscience is criminal law, as certain aspects of criminal law already reveal the naivete of most normative reasoning, such as the inconsistent treatment of people with equally disadvantageous cognitive deficits, whether congenital or acquired. But tort and contract law also assume a flawed conception of human agency and responsibility. Alces reveals the internal contradictions of extant legal doctrine and concludes by considering what would be involved in constructing novel legal regimes based on emerging neuroscientific insights.
- Nakladatel
- University of Chicago Press
- Rozměr
- 152 x 230 x 22
- jazyk
- angličtina
- Počet stran
- 368
- Vydání
- 1
- isbn
- 978-0-226-51353-9
- Vazba
- měkká vazba
- datum vydání
- 20.02.2018
- ean
- 9780226513539
Hodnocení a recenze čtenářů Nápověda
0.0 z 5 0 hodnocení čtenářů
0× 5 hvězdiček 0× 4 hvězdičky 0× 3 hvězdičky 0× 2 hvězdičky 0× 1 hvezdička
Přidejte své hodnocení knihy
Vývoj ceny Nápověda
Získejte přehled o vývoji ceny za posledních 60 dní.
Maloobchodní cena
Minimální prodejní cena:
0 Kč
Nápověda
Články, které stojí za pozornost
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
